LAB / 038
Delayed MuJoCo feedback: can an old observation predict now?
Twenty-four paired traces compare delay, position noise and constant-velocity prediction, retaining incomplete recoveries.
EXPERIMENT RESULT
01 / QUESTION
Twenty-four paired traces compare delay, position noise and constant-velocity prediction, retaining incomplete recoveries.
METHOD
Freeze protocol and source before execution, save raw records, then independently recompute metrics and verify hashes.
RESULT
Eight of 24 rollouts pass; all 80ms-delay conditions fail stability despite reduced overshoot with prediction.
OBSERVATIONS
Eight of 24 rollouts pass; all 80ms-delay conditions fail stability despite reduced overshoot with prediction.
CONCLUSION
Conclusions are limited to the stated variables and acceptance criteria, retaining failures and unverified scope.
LIMITATIONS
Teaching-scale fixed conditions, not online model quality, production throughput or hardware safety. The complete assistant and VL01 remain unfinished.
REPRODUCE
The article provides a pinned revision, environment, runner and independent audit commands.
KEEP EXPLORING
Related content
- Engineering cases
Delayed MuJoCo feedback: can an old observation predict now?
Twenty-four paired traces compare delay, position noise and constant-velocity prediction, retaining incomplete recoveries.
- PROJECT / 003
Hohoo Embodied Experiments
Two MuJoCo teaching scenes—pick-and-place and planar force control—record contracts, tuning, clearance and delayed-feedback outcomes, including failures.
- Engineering cases
MuJoCo obstacle clearance: a point path is not a body path
Six contact trajectories compare direct, edge and clearance paths while separating geometry from controller tracking.